Subject:
|
Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 00:49:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
580 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.starwars, William R. Ward writes:
> "mfuss903" <mfuss903@aol.com> writes:
> > In lugnet.starwars, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > > I just got permission to use some pictures of 10026. It includes a very high
> > > res pic that may not tell you much more of anything, but for a limited time,
> > > it'll be the pic in the LUGNET Set Database:
> > >
> > > http://guide.lugnet.com/set/10026
> > >
> > > Later, I'll swap in a normal-res version, because this is like 1MB
> >
> > Why are people rating this set already? I thought you are only supposed to
> > rate sets that you have.
>
> Sorry, maybe it's my fault, I was the first to rate it. I thought it
> was OK to rate any set - the inventory is independent.
I think it is. I've rated a few sets I don't own (but not many). As far as
I know, there is no standard protocol to rating sets; it's a non-scientific
system, so people use whatever criteria they want to rate them. Including
at least one person going through and rating several entire themes "0".
(More time than I've got on my hands, that's for sure.)
James
FUT -??
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
| (...) ....don't forget the atleast 1 50% dampener vote. That way at least every set in the LUGNET database is at least guaranteed not to get a perfect 100% rating. Benjamin Medinets (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
