Subject:
|
Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.starwars
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 00:12:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
466 times
|
| |
|
|
"mfuss903" <mfuss903@aol.com> writes:
> In lugnet.starwars, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > I just got permission to use some pictures of 10026. It includes a very high
> > res pic that may not tell you much more of anything, but for a limited time,
> > it'll be the pic in the LUGNET Set Database:
> >
> > http://guide.lugnet.com/set/10026
> >
> > Later, I'll swap in a normal-res version, because this is like 1MB
>
> Why are people rating this set already? I thought you are only supposed to
> rate sets that you have.
Sorry, maybe it's my fault, I was the first to rate it. I thought it
was OK to rate any set - the inventory is independent.
--Bill.
--
William R Ward bill@wards.net http://www.wards.net/~bill/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMAZING BUT TRUE: There is so much sand in northern Africa that if it were
spread out it would completely cover the Sahara Desert!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026
|
| (...) I think it is. I've rated a few sets I don't own (but not many). As far as I know, there is no standard protocol to rating sets; it's a non-scientific system, so people use whatever criteria they want to rate them. Including at least one (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
