 | | Mega high-res Picture of 10026 — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | I just got permission to use some pictures of 10026. It includes a very high res pic that may not tell you much more of anything, but for a limited time, it'll be the pic in the LUGNET Set Database: (URL) I'll swap in a normal-res version, because (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | (...) IMO, such a picture is useless - it doesn't fit on my screen (1600x1200 - the image is close to double that!). Especially since the guide picture popup doesn't enable scrollbars. Maybe we should change that? On Windows (which I'm forced to use (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.db.scans)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —John Barnes
|
| | | | | Interesting to see such a detailed closeup. The photographer was obviously very careful - chrome surfaces like that are great places to go looking for pictures of the photographer, and he(she) is nowhere to be found. JB (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —James Trobaugh
|
| | | | | | | (...) LOL, we must have too much time on our hands John, I tried to do the same thing and no where did I find a reflection of the photographer :) jt (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | | | (...) Too bad s/he didn't take as much care in setting up the model itself - peeling stickers, gaps between parts. Sloppy. I bet they didn't even make sure the LEGO logos on the studs were all turned the same way. ;) Steve (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —David VinZant
|
| | | | | (...) Thanks for the huge picture. I think I may have spoted a new peice. Atleast one that I havent seen before. If you look at the slope part under the whole conopy. It seems to be a 2x9 multi angle slope. We wont know for sure untill we get are (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Mark Neumann
|
| | | | | | (...) I think that piece is the same piece as the jedi starfighter 4x12 new slopy brick. It seems to be chromed, then printed with yellow and a blaster cannon port. Look closely, you can see the printing edge and the chrome sticking out from (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Gareth Bowler
|
| | | | | | | (...) It's a technic wedge belt wheel. (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —David VinZant
|
| | | | | | (...) Well I was talking about the part that is behind that. Under that back of the canopy. And I think those are just stickers on those chrome parts. So we should have a nice whole chrome slope. Dave (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | (...) Interesting picture, unfortunately it doesn't pop up in a window with a scroll bar, so I can only see the top half by moving the window around. Frank (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Jack Hawk
|
| | | | | | Frank, I had the same issue, but as always there is a way around. If your using IE, right-click the picture and select "Save As...", choosing a location that you'll remember where you saved it too (I chose my desktop). Once its saved, use exploder (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) You can also just right-click and open in a new window. The new window comes up with scroll bars. Chris (22 years ago, 22-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Mark Papenfuss
|
| | | | | (...) Why are people rating this set already? I thought you are only supposed to rate sets that you have. Mark (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | | | (...) Sorry, maybe it's my fault, I was the first to rate it. I thought it was OK to rate any set - the inventory is independent. --Bill. (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I think it is. I've rated a few sets I don't own (but not many). As far as I know, there is no standard protocol to rating sets; it's a non-scientific system, so people use whatever criteria they want to rate them. Including at least one (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | | | | (...) ....don't forget the atleast 1 50% dampener vote. That way at least every set in the LUGNET database is at least guaranteed not to get a perfect 100% rating. Benjamin Medinets (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026 — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | (...) It's okay to rate sets you don't have. there are no rules about it. I don't own a Main Street set or a Statue of Liberty, but I've seen other people's and looked through the instructions, etc. So, if I feel I know enough to be "qualified" to (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Typo (was Re: Mega high-res Picture of 10026) —Andrew Lillie
|
| | | | One thing I noticed thanks to this super-sized pic is that there's a typo on the sticker on the display stand. The description of the engines is labeled "hyberdrive." Hopefully this gets fixed in the production run. -Andy (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jun-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
