| |
In lugnet.starwars, Bruce Lowell writes:
> mark and mark- i did use a stud-to-foot ratio for this (nice job in
LOL that makes Muffin head and myself sound like 2 movie reviewers! 2 thumbs
up, Bruce!
> noticing, i got close enough to 31.5 feet), and i measured out pretty much
> anything that could be measured in trying to perfect the ship. i had
> schematics, models, model pictures and screenshots; almost everything of the
> ship. i think it helped
I'd say so, yeah. The proportions certainly look right.... the trick is to
find the right source material!
> i just see minifigs as being... vertically challenged ;)
Basically, so do I.... although if you have a minifig sitting down (4 studs
tall) you'll notice it IS in scale for a seated figure... because of their
short legs they essentially have a different scale standing vs. seated.
I know it's not directed at me, but what did you mean by 'tilt the wings'?
Mark W.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter
|
| (...) the wings/fins/what-have-you are not perfectly straight up and down, but at a really slight angle (they're closer at the top than at the bottom)... Adios, 8^) Brucey-Wan Visit My Site - (URL) (23 years ago, 24-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter
|
| hi guys. i suppose this is a response to all the posts. first off, thanks a lot for the comments and suggestions :). mark and mark- i did use a stud-to-foot ratio for this (nice job in noticing, i got close enough to 31.5 feet), and i measured out (...) (23 years ago, 20-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
