To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 11641
11640  |  11642
Subject: 
Re: Scale (Was: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:19:03 GMT
Viewed: 
1724 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Mark Sandlin writes:
...
> consider 1 stud = 1 foot, then your minifigs are only about 5 feet tall,
> which is well under average height for a human. But if you decide that a
> minifig is 6 feet tall, then they end up being about 2.5 feet wide, which is
> a pretty rotund person. :^)
> 
> Sometimes I scale things simply from of a lack of parts. My Skipray
...

Right, so now I try to scale based on other things (e.g a sitting minifig,
is around 1/35th scale but with super short legs... but if he's to be
sitting, I scale it to his sitting height). And yeah, running out of parts
is another consideration!

> Essential Guide are often just made up numbers. Then there are problems like
> the controversial Millennium Falcon scale issues.
Which is why I didn't even mention the Falcon! Worst of the bunch for us
scale fanatics!

> I try just to build stuff that "feels" right. It works for me. :^)
And likewise, why I said "I gave up". Heh. As long as a minifig fits in it,
it's minifig scale, I guess.

There is no scale, there is no scale......


Mark W.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Scale (Was: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter)
 
(...) I do this mainly because of the fact that minifigs have no scale. If you consider 1 stud = 1 foot, then your minifigs are only about 5 feet tall, which is well under average height for a human. But if you decide that a minifig is 6 feet tall, (...) (25 years ago, 15-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)

14 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR