To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / 11641
11640  |  11642
Subject: 
Re: Scale (Was: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.starwars
Date: 
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:19:03 GMT
Viewed: 
557 times
  
In lugnet.starwars, Mark Sandlin writes:
...
consider 1 stud = 1 foot, then your minifigs are only about 5 feet tall,
which is well under average height for a human. But if you decide that a
minifig is 6 feet tall, then they end up being about 2.5 feet wide, which is
a pretty rotund person. :^)

Sometimes I scale things simply from of a lack of parts. My Skipray
...

Right, so now I try to scale based on other things (e.g a sitting minifig,
is around 1/35th scale but with super short legs... but if he's to be
sitting, I scale it to his sitting height). And yeah, running out of parts
is another consideration!

Essential Guide are often just made up numbers. Then there are problems like
the controversial Millennium Falcon scale issues.
Which is why I didn't even mention the Falcon! Worst of the bunch for us
scale fanatics!

I try just to build stuff that "feels" right. It works for me. :^)
And likewise, why I said "I gave up". Heh. As long as a minifig fits in it,
it's minifig scale, I guess.

There is no scale, there is no scale......


Mark W.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Scale (Was: New MOC: A-Wing Fighter)
 
(...) I do this mainly because of the fact that minifigs have no scale. If you consider 1 stud = 1 foot, then your minifigs are only about 5 feet tall, which is well under average height for a human. But if you decide that a minifig is 6 feet tall, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Aug-01, to lugnet.starwars)

14 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR