 | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets —Dave Schuler
|
| | | (...) Why is it nearly every set non-UCS this year can be described in these terms? What happened to the good ol' days when LEGO produced sets that were good *and* were good part sources? Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets —Thomas Weigle
|
| | | | | (...) --> thomas weigle | w.i.m.p. web: (URL) .iMMersE your soUL in LOVE. (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets —Thomas Weigle
|
| | | | (Always great to hit the send button by mistake... Anyway,) (...) How about the shuttle and TIE from the 2001 line and the MTT from 2000? IMHO they're great models, and from what I've heard from others they're great part repositories. As for model (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Opinion on 2001 sets —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) Okay, those are good models, but they're in the vast minority in a two-year release schedule, so my question still stands. Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| | | | |
