To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *7023 (-10)
  Re: Star Wars LEGO Design Contest II
 
(...) I disagree. This would result in too many categories, or be restrictive on entries - you'd have to have the right sets to enter. Instead, the judge should consider the difficulty, detail and ingenuity in making the alternative, whichever set (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.build.contests, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) I *know* they're characters. Here's my point. Tell me the name of the guy who is portrayed by the Indian Cheif. The actual guy. There isn't one! It's just a generic figure. Now, I can tell you the names of the guys who are portrayed by the (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where are these survey answers coming from? (was: New Survey up for LEGO)
 
(...) I just wanted to second Todd's thoughts here. The main reason I have not participated in the survey is that it seems "fishy" to me. It seems to me if LEGO wanted an "Offical Survey" they would do it themselves not through a supposidly (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: New Survey up for LEGO
 
(...) Out of curiosity, where are you getting your numbers from? According to the SW site, the falcon is 27 meters long, which translates into about 88.5 feet, which should be 620mm long as a minifig scale model (1 minifig foot ~ 7mm, given that a (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Where are these survey answers coming from? (was: New Survey up for LEGO)
 
(...) Tim, I think it's totally great that "LEGO" (whatever that means) is soliciting feedback about SW:UCS sets!, but I'm still suspicious that this is an unofficial channel. If it is, then not only would it be misleading to say "LEGO wants to (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)  
 
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) Yes, this is another way in which it'd be a win for Lego. :) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Why can't we have a Lando: Lego's Race policy
 
(...) ...That would be a nightmare, since then I'd have to buy dozens of each set to make sure I got all the combinations of minifig head colours/patterns! :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wamalug guy ((URL) #160 (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
 
  Re: Mark's Lego Creations Update!
 
You know, sometimes I could just kick myself. :^P (...) Spacecraft (...) all (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)  
 
  This Past Week at FBTB
 
Started up the new UCS Survey for LEGO - Posted news of the AAT and MTT hitting retail in the UK - Set up the first several steps for building Shaun's AT-ST - Wrote a column for the site - Posted belatedly about the 1999 LEGO Maniax exhibition in (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: New Survey up for LEGO
 
(...) Making the Death Star as a UCS set wouldn't make sense. In order to make it large enough to see sufficient detail to justify the UCS status, it would have to be huge. I'm not interested in a $500 model that's essentially a gray sphere. I want (...) (24 years ago, 1-May-00, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR