 | | Re: David S Griffith (aka Clone Wars Designer)
|
|
Jason, Thanks. AC Pin (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: David S Griffith (aka Clone Wars Designer)
|
|
Jon, As much as I'm tempted to rebuke your post, I chose not to. AC Pin (20 years ago, 2-Jun-04, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Vader minifig tattoo on BME
|
|
Hey all, Spotted this today and couldn't let it slip without sharing it here: (URL) cool. I'm currently trying to get ahold of whoever this is inked onto. -Chris (20 years ago, 31-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: David S Griffith (aka Clone Wars Designer)
|
|
Rough day, Jon ?! This seems like harsh treatment of someone who obviously invests a lot of time, money, and effort into our shared hobby. Especially harsh comming from someone who has taken up a leadership/caretaker role as you have. If you (...) (20 years ago, 29-May-04, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: David S Griffith (aka Clone Wars Designer)
|
|
(...) Did you mean tap? (...) I ask this bluntly but with sincerity: What's your agenda here? It seems to me that you're posting this to at once drive hits to your site and transparently show (again) how much he liked your fairly mediocre MOC. I (...) (20 years ago, 28-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) And June 19, 2001 will live in infamy..., "I have 5 questions for you, Kyle..." ;] KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Ontario, Canada (20 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) I love creative Technology. ;-) I guess such a ship could be used to rescue people from damaged space craft or to enable direct connections between capital ships, but that is boring, this is a far more useful use of the technology (...) oh oh (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | David S Griffith (aka Clone Wars Designer)
|
|
Remember him who've commented about the TX-130 Republic Fighter Tank and the GAT Droid that I've built? He's got a website showing his contributions to the Clone Wars video game and more. You can get there from (URL) my links page> or (URL) clicking (...) (20 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Coruscant Hauler (Civilian MOC)
|
|
(...) Thanks! I've designed it to have the sleek but elegant look as a Coruscant vehicle. ACPin & Sons (20 years ago, 21-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) (URL) on the .space homepage, just scroll on down, a little further, there you go. Enjoy. We expect to hear from you within the week or we'll have to come and find you. Peace and history, Professor Whateverly (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Bubble Tech. Revealed!
|
|
(...) Of course, the bubble tender's use is in space, where noise could not be heard; therefore, the enemy is still asleep! Bill (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) Ah, I still have the link! Galaxy Enforcer Contest: (URL) never saw the .Space timeline, do you have a link? KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Ontario, Canada (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Bubble Tech. Revealed!
|
|
(...) And NASA forgot the bubble tender, too. So does the bubble tender make a lot of noise? I'd imagine that helps a lot on the annoy-enemy-encampme...s-at-sleep missions. Does the continual bubble coming out of the bubble tender make it move (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Bubble Tech. Revealed!
|
|
(...) No, no. Not pure O2. I should have specified. 21% O2, 78% N2, 1% "the rest of the stuff (in an earth-like atmosphere)." I'm not making the same mistake NASA did. (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Bubble Tech. Revealed!
|
|
(...) Astounding indeed! LOL! Of couse, when metal becomes tensely liquid, it is very unstable, especially when it is high. The only saving grace is that when it is transparent it is easier to ascertain its motives... ;-) Only oxygen? Mmmmmm (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Bubble Tech. Revealed!
|
|
(...) Continually laying bubble. I like it! (...) Ah, well, let's see here. I believe my "tech guys" in the R&D department came up with quite an astounding breakthrough as far bubble technology goes. The bubbles are made from a mixture of (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) Uh-oh! So, um, can I avoid the fish if I testify that I (URL) wasn't really> um (URL) explaining> um (URL) anything at all...>? I suggest that the practice of posting further explanations that obfuscate rather than clarify, utilize Junior (...) (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) I'll just have to make a bubble tender MOC that exceeds the word count then. It shouldn't be to hard. ~Clangador (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) I think I may love you. (URL) [ j o n ] (URL) zemi.net> (URL) moonbase> (URL) myspace> (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Tri-Wing Fighter Redux
|
|
(...) I propose a new rule: If the word count in explaining whatever contrived technology is required for a moc to work exceeds the piece count of said moc, then the builder gets slapped upside the head with a fish. <slap> <>< (20 years ago, 20-May-04, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
