 | | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) My favorite line from "Stand by Me" (Other than "S*** my fat one, you cheap dime-store hood!" James (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) A little bit longer, no more than a 50 foot difference in length. (...) Actually, if you can find the book The Making of Star Trek, there is a diagram that is a size comparison. Turns out that the TV Enterprise was about as long at the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) Hm, I thought that Enterprise-D was 2000 ft long, as the original ship was in the 950 ft length (Enterprise-A went to 1000 feet), and D was supposed to be twice and long and twice as high. My thought is that Enterprise-D would be smaller to (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) USS Enterprise NCC-1701: 289 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701A: 305 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701B: 467 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701C: 526 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701D: 641 Meters USS Enterprise NCC-1701E: 700 Meters USS Enterprise CV-6 (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) IIRC, I saw an overlay of the top view of 1701-D on the modern Enterprise aircraft carrier--they were the same length--front of saucer to back of nacelle is the same length as bow to stern. 1701-D was somewhat wider than the aircraft carrier, (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | RE: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) Don't know (...) Don't know (...) SUPERMAN! Duh! Cus he's a real man. Might Mouse is just a cartoon mouse. Mark M. (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) Okay, next question: how big would the original Enterprise (original series) be? (somewhat serious) How about the aircraft carrier Enterprise (WWII)? (somewhat not serious) Or modern Big-E aircraft carrier? (somewhat not serious) Or, an even (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
(...) IIRC, the enterprise-D is supposed to be just under a kilometer long, so it would be just under 2/3rds the length of an imperial-class star destroyer(1.6 Km or a mile) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | how large would the ISD be compared to the Enterprise-D?
|
|
How large compared to an ISD would NCC-1701D aka Enterprise-D be? (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
(...) Those slope indeed to appear to be what you describe. This should help us get some interesting roof designs. Now we only need the inverse. -Jason +---...---+ Jason Spears MichLUG - (URL) Page - (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Yet more new slopes appearing in 2003 SW?
|
|
Hi, all. Check out the nice box scan from FBTB: (URL) Look at the sonic cannon. Look at the feet. Those don't look like the rounded facet-slopes we've been seeing this year--rather, they look like half of a 3x4 wedge, which should go flush with the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: AT-TE!!! AT-TE!!!
|
|
(...) It would be neat to see a storyteller set with maybe a clonie and battledroid, or a collectors 3 pack of 2 regular clones and 1 clone commander. My cents, which I can't quite add up, they're foreign :( Hehe, ~Evan Butzlaff (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Ben's LEGO Millennium Falcon back on-line
|
|
(...) So THAT'S why they have a "preview post" option! So I could have seen that I typed "1" instead of "i" in my second "dirty Falcon" link: It should be: (URL) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Ben's LEGO Millennium Falcon back on-line
|
|
Ken, have you ever REALLY looked closely at the Falcon? The ship is covered in oil smears, laser burns, and DIRT! It ain't a shiny, new YT-1300. I think the dirt and discoloration adds to Ben's version, especially since the Falcon isn't white to (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: AT-STP
|
|
Now that's cool! I'd say that qualifies as a "tricka**" pod (see (URL) didn't read your message, just clicked on a picture link, and for a minute I didn't even realize it was a Pod. James Wilson Dallas, TX Lugnet #1783 (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC: Ackaly creature
|
|
Hey Bruce - This is cool!! Keep it up, I love your creations :-) -Tim (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: AT-TE!!! AT-TE!!!
|
|
(...) The red battle droids were a new division. That's the official reason they were red. According to the movie and the book. Just my 1 and 1/2 cents. Josh Wedin (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: AT-TE!!! AT-TE!!!
|
|
*sigh* When are we going to be able to get cheap Clone Troopers. I'm sure a lot of kids are going to be disappointed that they can't get em because their parents can't afford the big sets. (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Tusken Raider Camp
|
|
(...) That's exactly what one of my sons said after I've taken the pics. If the pics didn't come out fine, I would have redone the layout for it. It was kinda tough going with the limited supply of tan pieces that we've got. So we had to make do (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Tusken Raider Camp
|
|
That's right! Since I couldn't find the ninja headpieces which I originally intended to use for them. Regards, ACPin & Sons (...) (22 years ago, 15-Oct-02, to lugnet.starwars)
|
