To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.starwarsOpen lugnet.starwars in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Star Wars / *10613 (-10)
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) The AT-ST only sucks on three points in my opinion: (1) No Stormtrooper , (2) No AT-ST Driver, (3) The head does not turn left and right. I can correct the last myself, but the other two make upgrades expensive. On other bad news (relatively) (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Where are the 2001 SW sets?
 
Skip, I've lost faith in TRU with the 2001 line. I'm on the road a lot, and I make a point to visit every WalMart and TRU on my route. Although WalMart's shelves were bare for a couple weeks after Christmas, they wasted no time replenishing every (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) To be honest, I LIKE the AT-ST. No, it's not a wonderful set overall. For $10, however, it is. If you can manage to prop the legs in the correct position, it can walk fairly well, and I think the way they have the hatch is set up nicely. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) **snip of parts Mark likes** I'm also quite favorably disposed to the 1x4 brick with 4 side studs, not to mention the inverted 2x2 slope with viewscreen. Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) Why is it nearly every set non-UCS this year can be described in these terms? What happened to the good ol' days when LEGO produced sets that were good *and* were good part sources? Dave! (24 years ago, 19-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: And the winner is...
 
Excellent job by everyone. Also, kudos to Nathan Sawaya for his Death Star II. That is a really neat model and the only entry that I saw that wasn't a vehicle (well, a traditional vehicle, anyways). Tim Ralph Döring <doe@gmx.de> wrote in message (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) I don't personally care for the looks of the AT-ST, but I have bought four of them for the parts. Parts I like: -1x2 plate with click-hinge joint -New cylindrical click-hinge extensions -decorated 2x2 round tiles -gray canopy extension -dk (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Missing stickers
 
(...) Thanks all! called ca today, and had two sets of decals shipped out, no questions asked, no problems- a great service, if anyone's interested! thanks again! moish (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: Opinion on 2001 sets
 
(...) It's not a great AT-ST, but it's excellent for parts. I plan on buying many as soon as they go on sale. Same goes for the Escape Pod. Main model bad, parts good. Jeff J (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)
 
  Re: TIE offscale
 
(...) Hah! Or maybe he used a variation on my favorite quote from Dexter's Lab Darth: I am taking this X-1 Tie Fighter Ground Crew: Ok, Lord Vader, if you would just sign this requisition form. D: You fail to understand. I said I was taking the X-1 (...) (24 years ago, 18-Jan-01, to lugnet.starwars)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR