|
|
 | | More 2001 Star Wars, Studios, and LOM
|
| Hi all; Found some more Star Wars at Wal-Mart in Ottumwa, IA. <set:7127 7127 AT-ST> was $9.97 USD <set:7126 7126 Battle Droid Carrier> was $9.97 USD <set:7106 7106 Droid Escape> was $6.77 USD <set:7166 7166 Imperial Shuttle> was $34.88 USD Studios: (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Rest of Stwar Wars Ssyem line found in Canada
|
| Found the rest of the System line at TRU in Oakville yesterday (Watto's Junkyard, Shuttle). I think they were 10% off but no sign was seen (Watto $62.98, Shuttle $35.98). I came to this conclusion when I saw Watto as Zellers Burlington Mall today. (...) (24 years ago, 19-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| Jeff Johnston <sakura@mediaone.net> wrote in message news:G5sC88.725@lugnet.com... (...) fearsome, (...) He is? He looks very unsavory to me, grey skin, wrinkles, etc... (...) as (...) That is true, and some of Legos preliminary models have looked (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) Oh, come on. It's *LEGO* for Pete's sake. Even Darth Vader is 'cute' as a LEGO minifig. (...) I don't know if it's a question of talent or not. Judging from some of the stuff I've seen, it might well be a question of the limitations they have (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: star wars creations in lego
|
| That would be Eric Kingsley's page, The Scythe Squadron, one of the best Star Wars Lego sites I've seen (I'm still waiting for him to show us how to modify the B-Wing like he did!!! Damn they're good!) Here's the link: (URL) on Eric, show us how (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| CUTE??? Its an Imperial AT-ST!!! The designers designed it to look fearsome, deadly, and intimidating! Aauugghh! Ahem. Well I don't think it looks cute, I do think it is fairly good considering the price, and the fact that Lego Designers obviously (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Review: 7127 AT-ST
|
| (...) a few modifications help a lot. whoever designed the legs on this thing must have been trying to make it hard to stand. (...) I think it looks pretty good, for the most part. (...) well, the primary colors are not very visible, thanks to the (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) I love it. I'm having AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, AT-ST, spam and AT-ST for lunch. If LEGO can't give us the goods in the "way-over priced" range of old, at least they are making a bunch of these "decent as a main model but really good (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) For some reason I had it in my head that the AT-ST was $15, so I was pretty happy when I saw it was only $10. I agree that the parts were great, but I really would have been happier with even a $15 set and just a little more - a better hip (...) (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: 7106, 7126, 7166
|
| (...) I like it, too. It's a cute, fun, set. Everything Lego should be. Not to say I wouldn't want to see a UCS version to minifig scale. Kevin (24 years ago, 18-Dec-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
|
