 | | Re: On to other news.... —Greg Majewski
|
| | | (...) Sorry, it was started in 1978. (...) Sorry pal, but you're not going to win this. If you insist you are right, I insist that you check the release date on <set:924> (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Kyle Keppler
|
| | | | (...) Here's a list of sets from 1978 and there are definatly soem CS sets there: (URL) here is a timeline of lego space, which has a little entry under 78: (URL) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | (...) I believe you, but to play devil's advocate the instructions on Brickshelf show 1979. I seem to remember a debate coming up once before on copyright vs. release date. Can anyone point to a resolution, or am I just smoking crack? (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | | | | (...) For the sake of further evidence, I own a classic space LEGO box that says '1978'. it was purchased in the USA (for me as a kid). Differentiating characteristic between 493 in 1978 is the lack of a crater baseplate (uses bricks to build (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Jesse Alan Long
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I appreciate that you have shown the box for the proof of their arguement, Suzanne. Jesse Long (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Ronald Vallenduuk
|
| | | | | | | | My 889, 891, 894, 897, 918 and 920 all show (C)1979 on the instructions. I'm afraid the boxes never made it... However, 367 is (C)1975.... ;-) Duq "Suzanne D. Rich" <suz@baseplate.com> wrote in message news:3B3252A5.A405CE...ate.com... (...) started (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Geoffrey Hyde
|
| | | | | | (...) .html Kyle - or for that matter anyone with HTML knowledge - why won't that URL: be recognised or resolve to a proper URL: for my browser? IE5.5 brings back a 'page cannot be found' error when I try cutting and pasting that in. -- Cheers ... (...) (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Valid URLs (was: On to other news....) —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | (...) The ">" is extraneous, probably introduced by someones news / mail client when replying. If you go back to the first post with this link ((URL) it's correct. Note that ">" is invalid in any URL. ROSCO (23 years ago, 22-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) Fibblesnork is a framed site. You may not be able to get in that deep. Try this one: (URL) click on Futuron. That may not be the exact place Kyle was referencing, though. It DOES show a timeline and shows where Futuron fits in the scheme of (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | (...) There's a simpler answer than that - the frame in question is: (URL) original URL got split, then quoted, adding a ">" into the URL between "futuron-" and "timeline.html". If you look at Kyle's original message, the URL is correct -- Tom (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) Good catch! Missed that. In my defense, it was in the wee hours of the morning and I had just finished building my copy of Kevin Wilson's schoolhouse kit. An exhausting but impressive build! Man that kit comes with a lot of pieces. ++Lar (23 years ago, 24-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Kevin Wilson
|
| | | | | | | | Larry Pieniazek wrote in message ... (...) with (...) More than 1600 :-) Were there any actual Lego sets with that many pieces? I seem to remember 1400 as being about the highest. Kevin ---...--- Craftsman Lego Kits & Custom models: (URL) Lego parts (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | | | 5571 - 1743 pieces. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Check out 5571 for mainstream... over 1700 Check out Statue of Liberty for LD originated... over 2000 (both IIRC, I gotta go to my meeting no time to check) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Jesse Alan Long
|
| | | | | | | | (...) 1,600 pieces. The first set is a giant Lego figure with a hat and the second set is a model of the Statue of Liberty, which has many sand green bricks and plates. I do not recall the particular call numbers but I do remember that I have them (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Duane Hess
|
| | | | | | | | (...) The Black Cat/Giant Truck <set:5571> has 1743 The Silver Champion <set:8458> has 1412 The Statue of Liberty <set:3450>, which has already been stated, has 2882 Lego Mosaic <set:3443> has 1993 The Legoland Minifigure <set:3723> has 1849 The (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Jesse Alan Long
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Please forgive me for the mistake about the Silver Champion, Duane. I did not have my catalog with me. Jesse Long (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Kyle Keppler
|
| | | | | | (...) Yep, that's what happened. :-P --Kyle (URL) (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jun-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Jesse Alan Long
|
| | | | (...) (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | (...) I received the beloved 924 in 1978. I recall it quite vividly; I know that I received it for Christmas, and I know that I had it during Spring of 1979 (I still have it, of course!). Does this help you? Dave! (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: On to other news.... —Jesse Alan Long
|
| | | | (...) The sets were made in December of 1978 but were labeled as 1979. This is an occurence that happens much too frquently in merchandising and I think that Lego simply confused people with that approach to their customers. (23 years ago, 21-Jun-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
