 | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
| | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Mike Petrucelli
| | | | | | (...) You don't get it do you. You have not only violated Lugnet's TOS but also US Fedral law. (regardless of the fact it is not enforceable.) But first and for most you have violated the basic decency and trust of the comunity. You can never join (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Mike Petrucelli
| | | | | | | | (...) Desperation?! Ok for the English impaired: Even if your account is reinsated no one will forgive your transgressions. Bottom line is children are a large portion of Lugnet participants and common social decency is expected here. This is NOT a (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (canceled) —Scott Chambers
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Paul Easter
| | | | | | | Ok, it's time for me to step in... who am I? just a father who has heard a few to many unnecessary words. It takes at least two people to argue. If no one else will reply to this type of postings, they will quit. If someone wants to flame someone, (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Allen Romberg
| | | | | | | (...) Finally! The voice of reason! Thank you, Paul, for saying what many of us are thinking! Some additional comments, though: If someone gets their feelings hurt on lugnet, why must they subject ALL of us to their anger? I know when <I> read (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Jon Palmer
| | | | | Guys is it possible we could keep this discussion in off-topic.debate? -Jon "soc" <reallysick_of_crap@...tmail.com> wrote in message news:GDx9Jo.IDB@lugnet.com... (...) the (...) posts, (...) each (...) clarify? (...) about (...) proxy (...) I'll (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Scott Chambers
| | | | | | (...) <this is the REAL SOC speaking> YES!! By all means yes!! But one question - and this goes out to everybody that has asked this question... If you want it out of a group, FIX THE FOLLOW UP!!! You failed to do this, as well has most of the (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: I'm back... (Could someone clarify?) —Travis Dickinson
| | | | | I agree with Jon Palmer. Since he failed to put the desired newsgroup in FUT section, I've taken the liberty of doing it for him. This should apply to all discussions caused by soc's original post that obviously have gone off-topic. Travis Dickinson (...) (23 years ago, 26-May-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.cad, lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.publish.html)
| | | | | | |
