 | | Re: Giant Cruiser and MOC contest
|
|
Mini-Fig scale is the primary scale, but I'm not sure about nano-fig. What does everyone think about letting nano-fig entries in? I personally think it would ruin the contest..... (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Giant Cruiser and MOC contest
|
|
(...) How about spliting the contest into 2 catagories. 1 nano-fig and the other mini-fig. This would let those with smaller collections still participate. I definitly don't think Mini-Fig and Nano-figs creations should be judged side-by-side in (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Giant Cruiser and MOC contest
|
|
(...) I love nano- or micro-fig scale stuff. I like the challenge of coming up with totally new uses for elements, and seeing what others have thought of. One of my favorites comes to mind: a black minifig hand detached and used as a clip- on laser (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Giant Cruiser and MOC contest
|
|
(...) Yeah, it's probably best to have them judged seperately, but I feel I have to point out - I wasn't thinking "small" - I was thinking "largest I can pull off with my collection", which is maybe 3 or 4 feet. A Battlestar at minifig scale would (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Giant Cruiser and MOC contest
|
|
I would like to have the separation, too. I think that the minifig scale is terrific for fine detail, but some designs (I have done) are too huge for minifig. Maybe there could be a four-way split? Techfig scale, Minifig scale, Microfig scale and (...) (25 years ago, 22-Dec-99, to lugnet.space)
|
