 | | Re: M:Tron VS. Ice Planet.........
|
|
Chimera <trinityproject@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:FLpsKz.M88@lugnet.com... (...) them..Who (...) idea.. (...) In a short war I'd give the edge to Ice Planet b/c of their heavy missiles. You don't really think those babies are _just_ for (...) (25 years ago, 29-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: M:Tron VS. Ice Planet.........
|
|
(...) I'm not a big fan of M-tron. I think it is the weakest of the space series. The only thing M-tron was good for was introducing us to magnets and neon green pieces. As far as who would win? Well, everyone seems to forget that the ice planet is (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: M:Tron VS. Ice Planet.........
|
|
Andrew Knowles <powerone@slic.com> wrote in message news:FLzIz2.Hn1@lugnet.com... (...) point! I (...) series. (...) green (...) Do you have many of these sets? Both the Celestial Forager and the MCM have very cool articulation/steering mechanisms. (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: M:Tron VS. Ice Planet.........
|
|
In lugnet.space, Andrew Knowles writes: M-tron vehicles, while well equipped (...) Nitpick--- It is not cold or warm in space. It is a near vacuum. Hot or cold refers to the amount of kinetic energy in the particles of matter (I can't remember what (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: M:Tron VS. Ice Planet.........
|
|
(...) well (...) That is assuming that you're close enough to a star to be getting that kind of solar radiation. Out in deep space, say, Pluto's distance from the Sun, there is basically no solar radiation. Thus, space acts as a giant heatsink and (...) (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: M:Tron VS. Ice Planet.........
|
|
(...) what (...) enough (...) for (...) that (...) Chris (25 years ago, 30-Nov-99, to lugnet.space)
|
