 | | Some important GS issues
|
|
I really need some input on the categories on the site before it gets a lot bigger. -What do you guys think of the categories so far? Are they named appropriatly? Are some misleading? -Should there be more? If there were more specialized sections (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some important GS issues
|
|
(...) No, they're not misleading - it's going to happen that someone will interpret a "bomber" differently than the next. The point is that people are trying, and that's what makes it fun. (...) No less, please. (...) Both: heavy, medium, and small (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some important GS issues
|
|
One more suggestion: A description of each section on the page for that section would help people figure out what they are looking at and what would go in that section. Nothing too long, just a sentance or 2 describing the ships in the section... (...) (24 years ago, 2-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some important GS issues
|
|
Jon Palmer <jpalmer@oklahoma.net> wrote in message news:G3DEBH.Aoq@lugnet.com... (...) lot (...) be (...) or (...) up (...) destroyer (...) Maybe you should have a database with multiple keywords for each creation submitted to the GS archives. Based (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some important GS issues
|
|
This is an awesome idea. Instead of having these static categories which are more or less seperate I could have one database to dip into. I love the idea of having the keywords asigned to a creation-- a user could make any sort of list they wanted. (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Some important GS issues
|
|
(...) This would be REALLY cool, but someone who knows how to do this would have to commit themselves to ALOT of work, or at least do the main CGI stuff and then teach us how to update it... ;-P (...) I think the sections and all are just fine, all (...) (24 years ago, 3-Nov-00, to lugnet.space)
|
