 | | Moonbase demonstration module
|
|
I've mostly finished a module that I made for the Moonbase page. Click the picture below for the link, more description follows in my blog. Check it out and tell me what you think! (2 URLs) [ j o n ] (URL) [ z e m i d o t n e t ]> :: lego weblog :: (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, lugnet.general, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
Oh Man! That is so awesome! Great write up too. The shape and look of the podule AND the construction rocks. Wow, thanks for sharring that is soooo cool. e (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | A few of my Mocs used to play Battletech
|
|
Hello all, I finally got around to taking pictures of the last of my Mocs that were used in my Bricktek games of the last 3 years. They are now on Brickshelf for all to see. In chronological order (I think) they are: Whiplash (5 URLs) is the link (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.space, lugnet.gaming, lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) Flibbity Floo. Any "system" that has such heavy restrictions on building creativity sucks and should be abandoned. I mean really. Why bother with incorporating "trains" at all? JOHN (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) I see someone was replying at the same time as me! I forgot to add that I think if you have one fixed permanent corridor, it should be allowed to be supported from below however you want; this to allow a little more creative freedom. The (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) Another point on putting space train track on the edge of modules - it becomes vitally important that you follow a strict six-wide rule on your trains. i.e. not even half a plate of overhang is allowed for ladders or handles. The trains must (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) It was four directions so that however you put it together, it would make something compliant with the overall module standard. In the UK we're still using the 'Classic Moonbase' ;) standard, i.e. we haven't jacked ours up the extra bricks, (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) I think he means that the extra bits attached to the corridor assembly should not extend more than one plate below the corridor floor in order to keep the clearance for stuff passing underneath. --Bram (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
(...) snip (...) Very nice. It looks pretty cool, and seems like it'd look even cooler in a moonbase module, especially clustered together. Why limit connections to just the 4 horizontal directions? I see a 3 dimensional array of spheres as (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lambrecht-Lowell Stellar Cartography Podule
|
|
Awesome, Jason! Only problem is I can't decide which I like better, the Podule or those awesome corridors! Dave S. "Jason J Railton" <j.j.railton@ntlworld.com> wrote in message news:IGJt7K.r6E@lugnet.com... (...) a (...) (URL) Spherical Podule>> (...) (20 years ago, 16-May-05, to lugnet.space)
|
