Subject:
|
Re: ci maximum
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:51:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1185 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.space, Philip Painter (who cant make landing gear) wrote:
|
Concerning a landing gear: dear lord, I cant believe Im writing this...
takes an audible breath in. . . With a racer, landing gears amount to
unnecessary weight and moving parts as well as possible interruption of
aerodynamics. The only street a racecar sees is the track. The rest of the
time is spent in a truck to travel or in a garage, both of which could
reasonably have harnesses, racks, magnetic bays, bodybuilder midgets, lifts,
super-powered airhockey table, etc., to hold the car up so it doesnt have
to passively hover at all times. Or they could store it on top of some
really fluffy pillows. Or packing peanuts. Or coat the underside of the car
with oil and the floor of the garage could be covered in water. The only
limit is your imagination.
|
Fair enough. Depending on the race format, this could certainly be true.
(And I want to see pics of your bodybuilder midgets.)
|
I see no need for landing gears in most space-only military craft and I have
now reasonably extended this liberating policy to another genre: racing. I
know its difficult to shrug the tyrannical yoke of other builders
enslaving expectations. But why refuse an alternative of freedom?
|
Someone is a bit touchy today. Hm, building for fun? For your own enjoyment?
Not to fulfill others expectations?!? Sinful!!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: ci maximum
|
| Steven: Thanks for the response. I'm glad you like it! Tony: Thanks for the comments. I'm glad you like the design. No, I don't have a shot of the undersideit's pretty uninteresting so I didn't take one. But the engine compartment is only open in (...) (20 years ago, 30-Sep-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|