To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 35948
35947  |  35949
Subject: 
Re: Tanks or Power Armor
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space
Date: 
Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:37:24 GMT
Viewed: 
194 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.geek, Mike Petrucelli wrote:
   A mecha would have a very hard time getting close enough to make hand-to-hand relevant. A M1A1’s turret can do a 360 and stop on a dime from a dead start in 1 second. It’s not the most comfortable thing to do for the crew inside but it does allow them a tremendous advantage when in comes to the firing arc.

Well, the driver ought to be fine...assuming the turret crew doesn’t collectively puke all over him, that is... (hmm, imagine them spinning around like that at full speed with the governor removed) But yeah, if a mecha/PA tries advancing on an Abrams, it better have some good stealth technology built in (including nice padded shoes so it doesn’t make big stompy sounds when it walks). The only current ballistic weapon that’s supposed to be able to punch through an Abrams is the same type of round that’s fired by an Abrams (something to do with the fact that they’re clad in depleted uranium armor), according to Howstuffworks.com.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Tanks or Power Armor
 
(...) A mecha would have a very hard time getting close enough to make hand-to-hand relevant. A M1A1's turret can do a 360 and stop on a dime from a dead start in 1 second. It's not the most comfortable thing to do for the crew inside but it does (...) (20 years ago, 28-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space, FTX)

50 Messages in This Thread:






















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR