To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 35313
35312  |  35314
Subject: 
Re: 3vil Battleship Azazel
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:36:10 GMT
Viewed: 
1950 times
  
In lugnet.space, Tony Hafner wrote:
   In lugnet.space, Matthew Sklar wrote:
   3vil-o-licious! Great work all around. But one thing’s been bugging me ever since I first saw 3vil. How is it pronounced? Is it “e-vil”, “three-vil”, something completly different? I’ve been pronouncing it “three-vil”, but that doesn’t seem right. Is it right?

This subject came up at BrickFest PDX in February. Mark claims that it’s pronounced “evil”, but the consensus among everyone else was that if he’s gonna keep spelling it “3vil”, then we’ll keep pronouncing it “three-vil”.

That’s because you’re not 1337 Hafner.

Your Lord and Master,

3GA





Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: 3vil Battleship Azazel
 
(...) Apparently 3vil isn't either, 'cause then it would have to be "3\/1|_" or something equally stupid[1]. Proper 1337-speak is nigh illegible to the vast bulk of the population, and as a graphic designer you obviously know that to market a name (...) (20 years ago, 5-Aug-04, to lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: 3vil Battleship Azazel
 
(...) This subject came up at BrickFest PDX in February. Mark claims that it's pronounced "evil", but the consensus among everyone else was that if he's gonna keep spelling it "3vil", then we'll keep pronouncing it "three-vil". -- Tony Hafner (...) (20 years ago, 5-Aug-04, to lugnet.space)

41 Messages in This Thread:
























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR