Subject:
|
Re: Murasaki modular corridor system
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 07:03:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1245 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, David Laswell wrote:
In the text you mention that you used the bricks with pegs instead of bricks
with peg-holes, to avoid “wasting” the connector pegs. Two questions:
1. Don’t you find that the bricks with pegs are difficult to attach/detach?
That’s been my experience with this kind of solution. The added slop in the
actual Technic peg connection makes this much easier without accidentally
squeezing a corridor and shattering it, for example.
2. Are Technic pegs in short supply? I don’t have much Technic, but I have
never come close to running low on them. The bricks with built-in pegs are
often unused, I admit, but are you actually low on pegs or did I misread your
post?
--Bill.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Murasaki modular corridor system
|
| (...) Heh. We (and by "we" I mean "I", since I was the only one moving them around during setup) actually found that when you make the mistake of picking them up by the far ends of the corridors, the central hub is self-ejecting. I'd originally (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jul-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
