Subject:
|
Re: pre-CS question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 6 Apr 2004 20:02:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
776 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
| |
I’d say LEGO history is generally illogical - but then again, I’m not sure if
it was meant to be a history at all.
|
I would say that you are right about the history. My guess is that the designs
were simply meant to keep the line fresh, giving the collectors something new to
amass and giving the newbies something different than the previous year or so. I
doubt that TLC had any idea that we’d all gather online and compare notes this
far in the future.
I dimly recall someone getting their knickers in a twist about the LEGO space
chronology a while back. Ah, the absolutism of youth! I remember it well. Let us
be thankful that this is a forum that offers sage advice like this:
| |
And yeah - build what you like to do and have fun. Always a good rule to
live by. :o)
-Lenny
|
Ditto that, Lenny.
Peace and play well,
Professor Whateverly
(SigFig unavailable while Brickshelf is down. Anyone know when it’ll be back?)
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: pre-CS question
|
| (...) Having said what I've said, the Classic Space -> Futuron -> Space Police(BT1) did follow some sort of a logical projection. Past then, it gets a little a chaotic. lennah (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: pre-CS question
|
| (...) Sorry tony, but I've got to disagree with you here. The key, however, is that PCS is as much representative of NASA design as CS proper. That is the design challenge of PCS - to combine two very dissimiliar design styles and unify them. I (...) (21 years ago, 6-Apr-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
