To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 3232
3231  |  3233
Subject: 
Re: Bridget
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space
Date: 
Tue, 15 Aug 2000 13:50:22 GMT
Viewed: 
29 times
  
In lugnet.build.mecha, James Powell writes:

Nope.  It is somewhat translucent to it, to a range of somewhat less than 500
ft.

Otherwise, why do you think that we still work with SONAR for detection of
subs?

Because we can't get the laser technology to work properly yet, but the Navy is
currently funding major research & development programs to figure out how to do
just that.  It's no more blue-sky than supercavitating machine-gun bullets.

--Karim



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Bridget
 
(...) is (...) do (...) Yes, but the russians have fielded torps that use supercavitation. Sorry, don't know the Nato code name or the russian project des. James (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bridget
 
(...) Nope. It is somewhat translucent to it, to a range of somewhat less than 500 ft. Otherwise, why do you think that we still work with SONAR for detection of subs? James (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)

27 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR