Subject:
|
Re: Bridget
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 14:04:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1318 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.build.mecha, Mark Sandlin writes:
> I suppose, but wouldn't that be terribly inefficient?
>
> It would likely be simpler and cheaper to use a different type of weapon.
> And in the military, your weapon was made by the lowest bidder. ;^)
Hmm...I know I have read a article on the whole idea of supercavitation (in
relation to the USSR Rocket Torpedos) recently on the web...no idea where it is
though.
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Bridget
|
| (...) is (...) "Recent domestic and Ukrainian hydrodynamic research has explored the physics of a phenomenon labeled supercavitation. Proper design can minimize the drag on a submerged projectile, yielding "supercavitation drag reduction," which (...) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bridget
|
| I suppose, but wouldn't that be terribly inefficient? It would likely be simpler and cheaper to use a different type of weapon. And in the military, your weapon was made by the lowest bidder. ;^) ~M (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
