| |
I suppose, but wouldn't that be terribly inefficient?
It would likely be simpler and cheaper to use a different type of weapon.
And in the military, your weapon was made by the lowest bidder. ;^)
~M
--
Mark's Lego Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
> From: "Paul Baulch" <paul@vic.bigpond.net.au>
>
> That is, unless they are futuristic bullets designed to supercavitate.
> Finding out what the principle of supercavitation is, is left as an exercise
> to the reader... ;-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Bridget
|
| (...) Hmm...I know I have read a article on the whole idea of supercavitation (in relation to the USSR Rocket Torpedos) recently on the web...no idea where it is though. James (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| | | Re: Bridget
|
| Mark Sandlin wrote in message ... (...) exercise (...) Well, yes, but I'd thought you'd want to find out what supercavitation was all by yourself ;-) (...) Really? I thought that it was considered appropriate to spend an extra trillion on a weapon, (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Bridget
|
| Mark Sandlin wrote in message ... (...) That is, unless they are futuristic bullets designed to supercavitate. Finding out what the principle of supercavitation is, is left as an exercise to the reader... ;-) Cheers, Paul LUGNET member 164 (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)
|
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
