To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 3219
3218  |  3220
Subject: 
Re: Bridget
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space
Date: 
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 12:17:47 GMT
Viewed: 
28 times
  
Mark Sandlin wrote in message ...

Just a little nitpick... Bullets don't work very well underwater.


That is, unless they are futuristic bullets designed to supercavitate.
Finding out what the principle of supercavitation is, is left as an exercise
to the reader... ;-)

Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Bridget
 
I suppose, but wouldn't that be terribly inefficient? It would likely be simpler and cheaper to use a different type of weapon. And in the military, your weapon was made by the lowest bidder. ;^) ~M (24 years ago, 14-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Bridget
 
Just a little nitpick... Bullets don't work very well underwater. "Lasers", perhaps? ;^) ~M (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.space)

27 Messages in This Thread:









Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR