Subject:
|
Re: I know what you mean!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 2004 16:37:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
898 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, David Simmons wrote:
> Hey Dirk,
Hello Dave,
> Very nice model, and I know exactly what you mean about slender pylons and
> heavy nacelles. The Classic Trek movie Enterprise has always been my
> favorite iteration of the ship. I dearly wish I still had my South Bend
> electronic Enterprise toy that was reconfigurable. Remember that one?
> Check out this link if you don't, awesome toy, and very hard to find:
>
> http://www.calormen.com/Star_Trek/SouthBend/
Thanks, BTW, we share an affinity for the same ship, the Motion Picture
Enterprise is still a fantastic vessel.
About the electronic Enterprise.
I must admit that I came pretty late to the whole Sci-Fi scene, only one of the
disadvantages of living in The Netherlands. There really is no big fanbase for
Science Fiction or Fantasy, so there aren't a lot of people who you can talk to
about it, ergo, the availability of SF/Fantasy toys was minor when I was a
little kid.
To cut a long story short, I had never even seen it, until now. Nice!!
Things are improving though and I now have most model kits that are out there.
(what I really want are accurate models of every ship that has ever been used in
every SF movie/tv show ever, incl. animation. All the same scale ofcourse, for
comparison. Like that's ever gonna happen!!! :-( )
> Anyway, I once got it into my head to try a Lego version of the ship and I
> actually got as far as the nacelles, which came out really well (even had
> the blinking anti-collision light at the rear top!) until I realized that
> there was no way (minus epoxy) that the darn things weren't going droop from
> the weight. Someday though, someone's gonna figure it out, and we will all
> be picking our collective jaws up off the floor.
Those nacelles are a lot harder to build than the ones I made, I've tried and
failed to create them to my liking.
Yours had blinking lights? How big were they?
I was thinking that one way to stop the droop, would be to build in counter
weights. The problem with that is, that you wouldn't so much build them as be
balancing them. Not recommendable for shwooshability.
Let's just say it's a work in progress.
I want that someone to hurry up!
> Here's hoping!
>
> Dave
Here's hoping indeed!
Dirk
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: I know what you mean!
|
| (...) Hi Dirk and Dave, If you're interested in a cool Enterprise model, I can heartily recommend Bandai's Enterprise model: (URL) They're right about the colour scheme, it is more subtle than in the photos. Their Enterprise-E is good too, although (...) (21 years ago, 10-Mar-04, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | I know what you mean!
|
| Hey Dirk, Very nice model, and I know exactly what you mean about slender pylons and heavy nacelles. The Classic Trek movie Enterprise has always been my favorite iteration of the ship. I dearly wish I still had my South Bend electronic Enterprise (...) (21 years ago, 9-Mar-04, to lugnet.space)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
