Subject:
|
Re: No news is good news (re: It's awfully quiet in here)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:29:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
338 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jordan D. Greer wrote:
> In lugnet.space, Aaron Sneary wrote:
> > Perhaps it's good there's not much said, as a current search on space news over
> > at cnn.com found nothing but bad news. NASA safety panel resignings, China going
> > to space, a satallite declared a total loss. sigh
> >
> > The stars are aligned against us spacers currently. Let's crawl back into our
> > Moonbases and let this zenith pass.
> >
> > Besides, those castle folk need a break. No they don't. SPACE!
> >
> > Aaron S
>
> China going into space unfortunately signals a new rise in their power. However,
> this could very well give the USA the impetus to fully explore and exploit
> space. We ALWAYS need a common enemy or 'strategic competitor', otherwise groups
> always turn against eachother after a period of time.
Ah, now this is the best argument I've heard in response to my comment. Anyone
going to space is ok. But I think it' sad that the USA is letting time and
opportunity pass us by. That a 'competitor' could respark a space race, a public
interest space race. Sure we fans follow the X-Prize, but all of America
supported and followed the Apollo program. We need that kind of excitement to
get to Mars.
Aaron S
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: No news is good news (re: It's awfully quiet in here)
|
| (...) Americans may have supported it, but it was the political climate of the time that paid for it. It was a race to beat the Russions, not as much a race to get to the moon. Kennedy wasn't initially a huge fan of the space program(1), but when it (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: No news is good news (re: It's awfully quiet in here)
|
| (...) China going into space unfortunately signals a new rise in their power. However, this could very well give the USA the impetus to fully explore and exploit space. We ALWAYS need a common enemy or 'strategic competitor', otherwise groups always (...) (21 years ago, 27-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
