Subject:
|
Re: Now I'm thinking we should just ditch the roads idea too
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:53:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
425 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jon Palmer wrote:
> Bummer, considering I just thought up the word "moonway", but the train
> track idea has sorta taken this over. As buried below a bunch of modules as
> it might get the trains will still stick out because they'll moving around
> all over the place. But the roads might just get lost and hard to see.
>
> Thoughts?
I dunno - you make a good point. The road could/would/might get lost, but I
think it's at least worth a shot one time around. Might turn out better than
anticipated. I was always of the camp that there should be just as much
happening at ground level of the moonbase than at 8 (now 10) bricks up.
-Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | I'M thinking we should ditch the veritcal corridor idea
|
| (...) Moonways will stand out with red 1x1 rounds to mark them, but if there's trains moving around, they will get lost in the commotion. But, the roads don't really HAVE a standard other than that; they're flexible. Moonways can be layed out (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Now I'm thinking we should just ditch the roads idea too
|
| Bummer, considering I just thought up the word "moonway", but the train track idea has sorta taken this over. As buried below a bunch of modules as it might get the trains will still stick out because they'll moving around all over the place. But (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
