 | | Nailing down the new Moonbase standards —Jon Palmer
|
| | | I've been devoting most of my time to another LEGO project, but I'm back online tonight and want to start nailing down the new features. What I think is settled: First: Corridors will not be widened. Sorry widesters, but an overwhelming number of (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.space) !
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Nailing down the new Moonbase standards —Nick Kappatos
|
| | | | | In lugnet.space, Jon Palmer wrote: <snip> (...) The more I read about this, the more scary it is. I feel like those with modules underneath someone else's overlayed module will have their work lost, even more than those who get lost inside a (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Nailing down the new Moonbase standards —Andrew Saada
|
| | | | | Hey, Wanted to throw my two bricks in here - albeit I still have to respond to a bunch of posts - that I think these developments are really coming together, given the time since BF03. I'm looking forward to seeing some mobile transports in action. (...) (21 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Nailing down the new Moonbase standards —Jason Whittenburg
|
| | | | | (...) Is this just 'standard LEGO' height, etc? Let me know, I'm working on a monorail moonbase module right now and would like to not have to change it! Got to raise those corridors now. :-) (...) This makes sense, though it makes it hard to encose (...) (21 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Nailing down the new Moonbase standards —Markham Carroll
|
| | | | | "Jon Palmer" <jon@zemi.net> wrote in message news:HKrqGB.1rEE@lugnet.com... (...) vertical (...) I have come up with a vertical corridor design: (URL) (after moderation) (2 URLs) The main problem is that the connections wouldn't be as good as the (...) (21 years ago, 7-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Nailing down the new Moonbase standards —Aaron Sneary
|
| | | | (...) snip (...) Is it possible for the vertical corridor to be wide enough to support the entire upper module alone? I really think we should avoid mandating flat roofs for stackable modules. The other arguement for a wider center column than the (...) (21 years ago, 8-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| | | | |
