Subject:
|
Re: Moonbase Roads
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Sep 2003 23:34:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
395 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Dave Johann wrote:
> I'm all for this, but have no suggestions for the group.
>
> Please keep in mind that this would be next to impossible to implement for those
> of us using raised baseplates in the layout and for those that make use of the
> actual baseplate for their module. In essence, it would force modules to sit on
> pillars in order for a road to pass through. Also, is there a realistic way to
> built this without it looking like a giant grid? (I'm sure there is, I'm just
> throwing that out there for people to think about.)
My thinking is that not every module facing edge has to have both a road connect
and a module interconnect, it could have either, both, or neither.
Roads could become tunnels through modules that go right down to the edge, or
not go through at all. Tt makes the interconnection part of layout planning a
lot more complicated since you have to contend with two types of things though.
(and this is a great application for Cary Clark's TrackDraw once it's released,
everyone can do up their module in a fragment of XML and the layout planner can
just go crazy trying all the different permutations of what's possible.)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Moonbase Roads
|
| I'm all for this, but have no suggestions for the group. Please keep in mind that this would be next to impossible to implement for those of us using raised baseplates in the layout and for those that make use of the actual baseplate for their (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.space)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
