To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.spaceOpen lugnet.space in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Space / 27663
27662  |  27664
Subject: 
Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space
Date: 
Mon, 1 Sep 2003 03:18:17 GMT
Viewed: 
845 times
  
In lugnet.space, David Laswell wrote:
   That’s what computerized control systems are for. I’m sure that’s the idea behind the Babylon 5 Starfuries. Remember, physics works a bit differently in a vacuum than it does in a thick atmosphere. In an atmosphere you can use steering fins to alter the course of the missile, but in a vacuum, thrust is the only thing that matters. Changing direction with only a single point of thrust is impossible in a vacuum, and the wider your thrust base is, the more efficient it will be...as long as you didn’t cheap out on the control system.

Hey, this question is going off on a tangent, but can angular momentum be represented by the standard p=mv (with v represeting angular velocity)? Regarding gyroscopic inertia, can gyroscopic momentum be treated normally in order to calculate the force needed to move it on the vertical or lateral axes?



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
 
(...) That's what computerized control systems are for. I'm sure that's the idea behind the Babylon 5 Starfuries. Remember, physics works a bit differently in a vacuum than it does in a thick atmosphere. In an atmosphere you can use steering fins to (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)

25 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR