Subject:
|
Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Sep 2003 03:18:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
845 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.space, David Laswell wrote:
|
Thats what computerized control systems are for. Im sure thats the idea
behind the Babylon 5 Starfuries. Remember, physics works a bit differently
in a vacuum than it does in a thick atmosphere. In an atmosphere you can use
steering fins to alter the course of the missile, but in a vacuum, thrust is
the only thing that matters. Changing direction with only a single point of
thrust is impossible in a vacuum, and the wider your thrust base is, the more
efficient it will be...as long as you didnt cheap out on the control system.
|
Hey, this question is going off on a tangent, but can angular momentum be
represented by the standard p=mv (with v represeting angular velocity)?
Regarding gyroscopic inertia, can gyroscopic momentum be treated normally in
order to calculate the force needed to move it on the vertical or lateral axes?
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
|
| (...) That's what computerized control systems are for. I'm sure that's the idea behind the Babylon 5 Starfuries. Remember, physics works a bit differently in a vacuum than it does in a thick atmosphere. In an atmosphere you can use steering fins to (...) (21 years ago, 1-Sep-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|