Subject:
|
Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Jun 2003 02:40:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
479 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Soren Roberts wrote:
| |
Warhead dynamics, for one. You’d need different shapes for different types of
projectile, depending on the desired type of impact. Just as an example, HEAT
(High Explosive Anti-Tank) missiles use a cone to focus the explosion into a
thin jet, allowing the missile to pierce greater thicknesses of armor.
|
But isn’t that cone inverted within the shell body?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Theoretical Question: Missile Design
|
| In lugnet.space, Leonard Hoffman wrote: <Big snip> (...) Warhead dynamics, for one. You'd need different shapes for different types of projectile, depending on the desired type of impact. Just as an example, HEAT (High Explosive Anti-Tank) missiles (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
25 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
