Subject:
|
Re: Memphis Class Medium Multipurpose Carrier
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Fri, 15 Aug 2003 15:17:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
729 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Soren Roberts wrote:
| |
Hmmm. I’m generally a fan of functional/ugly designs, but this one doesn’t do
it for me. There’s just not a lot to hold my attention. I’d recommend:
(A) Building a little larger. At this size, it’s impossible to add more than
rudimentary greebs. Same for turrets or engines, and there’s no room for
SNOT.
(B) Trying something less conventional. Play with different shapes, styles...
The bridge doesn’t always have to be on top, the fighter bays don’t have to
launch forwards (they could launch down or sideways, for example). Try for
something outlandish.
(C) Play some of This. Try building
one of the ships.
Take care,
Soren
|
Thanks for the comments and suggestions. I’ll try rearranging the bridge and
fixing the fighter bays sometime. Thanks for the help.
-Dan
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Memphis Class Medium Multipurpose Carrier
|
| Hmmm. I'm generally a fan of functional/ugly designs, but this one doesn't do it for me. There's just not a lot to hold my attention. I'd recommend: (A) Building a little larger. At this size, it's impossible to add more than rudimentary greebs. (...) (22 years ago, 15-Aug-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
