 | | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
|
(...) No single number for minimum could be correct. There are three dimensions for a ship. All three must be taken into account. I suggest that perhaps 60 long by 24 wide by 16 tall would fit the smallest capital ship I can think of. (...) Small (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
|
"Wayne R Hussey" <eskimo2@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:H1MyJp.7Iv@lugnet.com... (...) I don't care how hard it is do to, I would love to see a minifig-scale star destroyer! What would the scalimg be? 1 lug = 1 sq ft? That would require (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
|
(...) the details. Is it still in existence, have you gotten any farther? Thanks, George (22 years ago, 30-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
|
(...) Thanks, George. Yes, it still exists. Currently it is in need of some minor reconstruction. I plan to show it at NWBrickCon - minus the detailing. That is due to the fact that for the last several months I have been working on my seven foot (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
|
(...) So would I! I've been using one stud = one foot for Minifig scale. A mile (5280 ft) could be well represented by 5000 studs. My calculations show that such a construction would be 1562.5 inches or 130.2 feet! At that size, you could (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Defining the term "Capital Ship"
|
|
"Wayne R Hussey" <eskimo2@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:H1ssov.Mwx@lugnet.com... (...) Wars: (...) star (...) that (...) you (...) Uh... anyone work for LEGO who want to try this? I would go to a LEGo park to just see that! : ) I think (...) (22 years ago, 2-Sep-02, to lugnet.space)
|
