Subject:
|
Re: biggest capital ship ever...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Wed, 28 Aug 2002 14:32:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
418 times
|
| |
| |
"Jon Palmer" <jon@zemi.net> wrote in message news:H1L3J4.6rJ@lugnet.com...
> "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message
> news:H1L0As.Mpn@lugnet.com...
> >
> > Well, not being a space-head, I'm not really up with the definition of
> > "capital ship" but here's one of paul baulch's ships that's pretty large
> > http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=49874
> >
> > (That's his space shuttle too)
> >
> > ROSCO
>
> Ahh thats one of Paul's 2 mystery ships :-)
Hmmm, looks like some classified material was leaked to the media... ;-)
>
> All I can say is I'm just glad he keeps these built. Seeing them pop up in
> the random LUG or event photo is almost as nice as having a large archive of
> pics.
Well, I did completely dismantle then rebuild the fore section of the grey
"carrier" differently because I wasn't happy with it. I don't think I'll
ever actually be dismantling them, though. Who knows, someday I may find the
time to adequately photograph them, too! Currently there be ships that need
buildin'.
>
> Great looking ships. And that shuttle is damn cool too.
Thanks. I feel a bit slack about not documenting these more fully, but then
building is more important. I have several more projects in early stages of
construction and have enough trouble finding time to work on those.
>
> Regarding "capital-ships". This has always been a pretty nebulous term used
> on Lugnet. Some things to think about: [...]
> Among other things, what I'm getting at is should we still use this term to
> describe all of our large LEGO ships? What are the pros and cons of using
> the term? What are our options? This is a great subject. I'd love to hear
> everyone's ideas.
I don't think that I've built a capital ship yet - I consider even the
longest ones (~180 studs) to be frigates. I feel funny about calling my
'carrier' a carrier as the word suggest battleship sizes to me - my
'carrier' is just a frigate with a spine for 20 fighters... although it is
almost as long as Dan Jassim's 'Gibraltar'.
I'm planning to build some undoubtedly 'capital' ships like
battleships/battlecruisers, though - but I'll be going microfig scale.
They'll be between 70 and 100 studs, which is pretty big for microfig
(although it'll be small microfig, around 1/15th that of minifig). I might
make them even longer than 100 studs, if the gray doesn't run out! :-)
--
Cheers,
Paul
LUGNET member 164
http://www.geocities.com/doctorshnub/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: biggest capital ship ever...
|
| "Ross Crawford" <rcrawford@csi.com> wrote in message news:H1L0As.Mpn@lugnet.com... (...) Ahh thats one of Paul's 2 mystery ships :-) All I can say is I'm just glad he keeps these built. Seeing them pop up in the random LUG or event photo is almost (...) (22 years ago, 29-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|