 | | Re: New MOC: Retail Style Moonbase Module —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Way cool. LOTS of great touches. Very detail dense. Bigger is not always better! Is it just me or has this idea caught on faster and stronger than any other idea ever posted here? Up till now, the 1592 variations had that honor I think, but (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: New MOC: Retail Style Moonbase Module —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | (...) I would attribute it to the fact that just about anybody can build one. Heck, even Shiri :-) Also, we spaceheads finally have a simple standard to follow. Other than the square 48*n x 48*n footprint and position of the easy to build (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: New MOC: Retail Style Moonbase Module —Chris Maddison
|
| | | | | (...) Thanks Lar. (...) Yeah, it's quite a thing, isn't it? Hopefully most of these modules end up at Brickfest so we can see what we get when we slap em all together. -Chris (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Rapid Growth of Moonbase (was: New MOC: Retail Style Moonbase Module) —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Besides what Jude said (anyone can build one), I think the 48x48 footprint is helping speed the process because it limits the more advanced builders. Before, you'd get started on a project, and keep building, and making it bigger, and adding (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rapid Growth of Moonbase —Chris Maddison
|
| | | | | (...) I gotta agree with that. This allows everyone to participate more, by making less. Or something witty like that. :-) And, I think that 48x48s coupled with 96x96s give a great flexibility and variety - think most buildings on 48x48 with some (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Rapid Growth of Moonbase (was: New MOC: Retail Style Moonbase Module) —Tom Sciortino
|
| | | | "Steve Bliss" <partsref@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:im8qluco8qsd9i9...4ax.com... (...) other (...) better!!!! (...) Heh, I find it limits us in quite the opposite way - I've never built anything near the size of a 48x48 baseplate! It's quite a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
