 | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Fred Rueck
|
| | | (...) Amen to that! I thought the whole Star Wars theme was a kick! I thought it a smart move on the part of TLG, HOWEVER, I have to agree with Mr. Wilson regarding the lack of good space sets in recent years. And the absence of any planned (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Is the proscription against LEGO producing "clearly" .space sets, which was part of their agreement with Lucas to get the SW license, still in effect? That might explain why LD hasn't been going for space sets (yet). LFB (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | (...) Brad said the prohibition lasts at least through the next two movies. We really can't complain because the SW line is incredible, and likely better than what would take it's place. The only thing I wish they would do is bring back more (...) (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Bob Parker
|
| | | | | (...) Does this mean no Classic Space <set:497> Galaxy Explorer as part of the Legends re-releases? Arrrgh!! Or would it be OK since it was originally copyrighted well before this Star Wars agreement went into effect? - Bob (23 years ago, 18-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) Double Arrrgh!! (...) I would hope this could be true for any number of space sets. I can second a desire for more trans-yellow elements. I have 3 copies of the Message Intercept Base, but I'd take more more for the elements. Renegade is cool (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Stelios Kalogreades
|
| | | | | | richard marchetti wrote: CHOP!!!! (...) I can't agree more on this! Wouldn't some genuinely "evil" space theme ala Blacktron 1 be good (yes, what's new there? ;-) Maybe I should mention that on the new feedback section of www.lego.com Bye, Stelios (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | (...) (Ya gotta love my timely participation in this thread! ;] ) Okay, if TLC is restricted from producing any "clearly" space sets, then how can they produce the Life On Mars line? I've been curious about this for quite some time. KDJ ___...___ (...) (23 years ago, 29-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Stephen Rusnak
|
| | | | Brad stated no "Fantasy" space sets. LOM is pretty much an offshoot of the town spaceport subgroup and is not precluded by the agreement. -- Overkill is the only sure kill. SR "Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 30-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: why has lego direct ignored the space theme? —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | (...) And LOM isn't fantasy?? TLC baffles me... KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (23 years ago, 31-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| | | | |
