 | | Re: another Galaxy Enforcer MOC
|
|
(...) Talk about life imitating art! Check this out fellers! (URL) McD. when replying, Spamcake.. the first name in supertoxic fuels. (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: another Galaxy Enforcer MOC
|
|
(...) Joel, what I want to know in my mind is how the LEGO spacemen see out of the cockpit windows when you have made them out of solid grey windows when you can not see. Do they only fly on instrumentation Joel? Because I had an idea for a (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: another Galaxy Enforcer MOC
|
|
(...) ROFLMAO! Maybe there should be a contest, who can make the best Galaxy Enforcer. Remember, you don't need wings in space. -Tim (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | another Galaxy Enforcer MOC
|
|
Hiya! I just built a ship I call The Galaxy Enforcer: (URL) let me know if it has a high enough gun to length ratio. and, please don't mistake the giant guns on the side that turn into engines for wings okay? thanks. Thay also act as coffeemakers in (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: tinkering with docks
|
|
(...) sadly, no they don't clamp the way you are thinking, however... that's a cool idea perhaps. I'm not sure what kind of practical use it would have, but it might be fun to try it. cheers! Joel K (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: tinkering with docks
|
|
(...) I like these ideas very much. So you're saying, this concept clamps around a hole in the wall or ceiling, not requiring it to be fastened by studs on the wall or ceiling? ~Trev (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: "Galaxy Enforcer" name retracted
|
|
***** ATTENTION LUGNET SPACE COMMUNITY ***** At this time (7:30PM, Pacific Daylight Time, July 10, 2001) I am officially announcing that I, Matthew Gerber, will/may, at some unforseen time in the future, be calling some possible MOCs by the (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: "Galaxy Enforcer" name retracted
|
|
(...) I agree you 100%, Pat. Anyways, I *still* liked your model. That reminds me, here is an old Astro Lift Co. "Galaxy Enforcer" from long ago: (URL) Lift Co. (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: "Galaxy Enforcer" name retracted
|
|
In lugnet.space, William P. (Pat) Hough writes: <snipped Jesse Long's immediate Execution-By-Sarcasm, so thoroughly, extremely, perfectly well performed by Pat> ROTFLMAO! Matt (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Evolution of Earth and moon (was: Couldn't resist)
|
|
(...) More accurate at measuring *speed*. We were talking about distance. Careful reading of both articles reveals no claimed difference in accuracy for distance measurement, since it's the same technique being used. (the speed difference is because (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: New MOC - The Galaxy Enforcer
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jesse Alan Long writes: <snip> (...) Sooooo, let me get this right. What you're saying is: You have not made the space craft that you are refering to, and they are not in LDRAW, but you are trying to tell people not to use names for (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: "Galaxy Enforcer" name retracted
|
|
(...) I don't think you or anyone else should have to do that just because of a name!!! (unless it's trademarked, or unless you're using it for commercial purposes, neither of which apply here). (...) Further, I don't think you should feel like you (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | "Galaxy Enforcer" name retracted
|
|
JA Long writes: "I am not impressed, however, that you have used some names for some of the vessels for my LEGO Space theme but then again, you did not know that I was using those names so let me help you find new names for your space craft and help (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Evolution of Earth and moon (was: Couldn't resist)
|
|
(...) Not quite. There's a good comparison here (URL) talking about speed radar versus laser. Basically the laser is more accurate, but requires more accurate aiming by the operator. ROSCO (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: tinkering with docks
|
|
(...) I agree, I'd love to find a way to get more headroom in there, but the current size just has too many great features. I think that if it gets much bigger it would be alittle too bulky. at least IMHO. It is designed to be a universal port, so (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: tinkering with docks
|
|
(...) actually I didn't plan on using this part in the final design, it was a fast mockup of the idea. However, I was using this part: 'Technic Steering Arm with Connectors' (URL) quite strong. (...) I am going to have the whole docking chunk slide (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Evolution of Earth and moon (was: Couldn't resist)
|
|
(...) Would there be any difference in the accuracy of laser vs. radar? I'm not enough of an EE geek to know, but thought "no" because they're just different wavelengths of the same thing, right? Or does the wavelength difference (it IS many orders (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Iron Eagle has been destroyed, but there is hope...
|
|
(...) Gee...from spritely family shuttle to heavily-armed-and-lo...or-trouble warship...guess you'll show that shelf a thing or two next time it decides to collapse, won't you? ;?) Matt (24 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | The Iron Eagle has been destroyed, but there is hope...
|
|
At 1432 hours on July 9th the Iron Eagle: (URL) from 6 feet up when the Bookshelf Landing Platform collapsed. The crew of two prepping for take-off were unscathed but the Iron Eagle was a total loss. Lt Rick immediatly on completion of the (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Building tips section at the 'Shipyard
|
|
(...) When I started the section I considered putting the text on my site but decided to go this route simply because I can add new tips much quicker. (...) I may do this at a later date but for now I think I'll just keep linking to Lugnet. -still (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.space)
|
