Subject:
|
Re: Evolution of Earth and moon (was: Couldn't resist)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:12:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9048 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.space, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> Weren't there other methods used recently as well? I'm not
> sure that any would be as accurate as a laser, given that
> the international meter standard is based on the speed of
> light (as of the 1980s, I think). Somehow using radar sticks
> in my mind, but that might just be a holdover from earlier
> measurement in the 1940s and 1950s.
Would there be any difference in the accuracy of laser vs. radar? I'm not
enough of an EE geek to know, but thought "no" because they're just
different wavelengths of the same thing, right?
Or does the wavelength difference (it IS many orders of magnitude in
difference) matter?
++Lar
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
195 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|