 | | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
"Wolf Read" <readw.at.oniddotorstdotedu> wrote in message news:JD0w78.Hvr@lugnet.com... (...) I like the gray best. (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
(...) Thanks much! I'm always happy to hear other people's interpretation of what I've created (this goes to everyone who's commented on my postings--thank you all!). Your nitpicks touched on one of the biggest struggles I've had with this MOC. I've (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Astronaut arrested in alleged kidnap attempt
|
|
(URL) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
[somewhere far away in the internet, a poor soul struggles valiently to stay on-topic... "it's not LEGO!!" he screams, but the siren song of inccorect physics draws him screaming back into the fray once more...] (...) I still have my doubts. It's (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) Actually space manufacturing will likly be a big business sooner (as in the next few decades) than people might think. Due to the "instant" cooling space permits it is possible to make super strong alloys that are physically impossible to do (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
(...) I like this quite a bit - it would have come in handy tootling around my Moonbase module (the Alpha-Omega Landing Pad II) for sure! My two nitpicks are so small I can't believe I'm bringing them up, but I would have figured the Classic Space (...) (18 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) Tourism will be the initial market for suborbital space transports. The prime example of this sort of craft will be Space Ship Two (Virgin Galactic). (...) Actually, I thought that there was already some concern on the part of scientists that (...) (18 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
(...) Wolf, Another great Classic Space MOC! Actually this is my favorite (so far) since it is such a unique concept and very well executed. I like the idea of a maintenance transporter for larger spacecraft very well. As always, you uphold the (...) (18 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) Actually, exactly the point I was trying to make (you just made it shorter). If there's an economic or resource-driven reason for doing something, commercial interests do a great job. But if you want to go somewhere, trying to invent (...) (18 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
I love the classic Space look. I wish I had those yellow windshield pieces. (18 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Two moonbase modules from Brickfest 2006
|
|
(...) ...nice balls. ;D (18 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
(...) Just wait till we need the water... Sorry to intrude spacers ; ) God Bless, Nathan (URL) (18 years ago, 5-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
First off, (having missed the start of this thread), I really wasn't all that shook up by the announcment for the simple reason that the announcement doesn't mean anything. Any more than it did with the previous "we're going to Mars" pushes. (...) (...) (18 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | My Gunstar gets kudos from one of the programmers!!
|
|
Hey all, Ever since I got back into the hobby all those years ago, making MOC's and posting them to my website, I've had a simply grand time. The hobby continues to be very fulfilling for me, despite the cloudy future that TLG faces. However, (...) (18 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: NASA IS GOING BACK BABY
|
|
"Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@rmspam...mspam.com> wrote in message news:JA4GuG.E05@lugnet.com... (...) Jeff, your post met my sentiments exactly. I'm really glad to see no national flags on the "Mars Mission" sets - and none on the "Life on Mars" (...) (18 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: New Space Sets!
|
|
"Mike Petrucelli" <lordi@erols.com> wrote in message news:JBGuu3.C21@lugnet.com... (...) The links were really slow to download, so the images have been mirrored here: (URL) (18 years ago, 3-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
"Wolf Read" <readw.at.oniddotorstdotedu> wrote in message news:JCwrny.FK3@lugnet.com... (...) I thought you were going to say it had an invisible force field so they can work on the deck without cumbersome gear. Thanks to idea book 6000, everyone (...) (18 years ago, 3-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Eastern Block Space Patroller
|
|
"Wolf Read" <readw.at.oniddotorstdotedu> wrote in message news:JBtzB1.ozB@lugnet.com... (...) Looks like an up-armored Beta-1 Command Base (6970) with Hovercraft (6875) inspired canopy. With that kind of heritage, it'd be hard not to be a classic. (...) (18 years ago, 3-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, lugnet.build, lugnet.announce.moc)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
(...) They're trained to hold their breath for a looong time. ;o) Actually, the world they are on is supposed to have an atmosphere, albiet a thin one. :o) -best, Wolf (18 years ago, 3-Feb-07, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Spaceship Surface Transport
|
|
"Wolf Read" <readw.at.oniddotorstdotedu> wrote in message news:JCwpLo.1A2@lugnet.com... (...) Nice. The women seem to be without helmets and tanks. Surely they're done for. :o (18 years ago, 3-Feb-07, to lugnet.space, lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.build)
|
