NQC ("Not Quite C") : 560


Robotics / RCX / NQC / 560	559 \| 561

Subject:	Re: Duplex Comms with RCX
Newsgroups:	lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.tele, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date:	Thu, 27 Apr 2000 00:40:14 GMT
Reply-To:	MATTDM@stopspamMATTDM.ORG
Viewed:	198 times

Dave Baum <dbaum@spambgoneenteract.com> wrote: > I hate transmitting garbage every few seconds and possibly trampling > incoming data. Fair enough. It's too bad it doesn't have an always-on mode. > I'm also not sure this is a very good long-term solution. Really a > general purpose message sender/receiver would be much better than adding > yet another option (and a strange operating mode) to nqc. Definitely agreed. I'll be patient. -- Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/ Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Duplex Comms with RCX
(...) I just haven't found a non-intrusive method for keeping the tower alive. I hate transmitting garbage every few seconds and possibly trampling incoming data. I'm also not sure this is a very good long-term solution. Really a general purpose (...) (25 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.tele, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

11 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Active threads in Robotics

	Verified and Trusted Team of Hackers 16 hours ago

Custom Search