To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 11379
11378  |  11380
Subject: 
Re: Duplex Comms with RCX
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.tele, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Thu, 27 Apr 2000 02:01:57 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm.org#spamcake#
Viewed: 
5064 times
  
Kekoa Proudfoot <kekoa@pixel.Stanford.EDU> wrote:
Obviously new hardware (or a hardware hack) would be preferred, but short
of these, what other choices are there?

I actually prefer the "junk" solution to a hardware hack.

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                     --->               http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux             --->                http://linux.bu.edu/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Duplex Comms with RCX
 
(...) It seems to me that, given the current hardware, the choices are: send junk or let the tower go dead. My thinking is that if you send junk and trample something, so be it; the tower would have gone dead anyways, forcing you to lose whatever it (...) (25 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.tele, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR