Subject:
|
NQC beta test release policy
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jan 2000 13:52:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1654 times
|
| |
|
|
As this is my first post to this newsgroup, I thought I'd start by
saying how wonderful I think nqc is etc. I got the RIS 1.5 for xmas and
had nqc up and running in no time on my linux system. As well as being
an excellent language and bytecode compiler, another good thing about
NQC is that it's Free Software.
In the light of this fact I find it somewhat illogical that the NQC 2.1
beta test is a closed source binaries-only release. Not only does it
exclude those unable to run mac/win32 binaries, but it also makes the
bugfix process more difficult.
I would be interested to hear thoughts on this.
TIA
--
Leonard Stiles
email: lstiles@hotpop.com
ICQ: 28845586
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: NQC beta test release policy
|
| (...) Illogical yes, but not without its reasons. The exclusion of linux and source from beta isn't really a result of any policy, but just to make things more convenient for me. Here's why... I don't have 24/7 access to a linux box, so making a (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| | | Re: NQC beta test release policy
|
| First of all, I don't think there's anything wrong with not releasing binaries of a beta release, be it for linux or any other platform. Of course, if a large sector of the user base is on mac and windows and therefore cannot build their own (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
