Subject:
|
Re: What should be in the next version of RcxCC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Oct 1999 03:52:56 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1682 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <FK9A2y.9Fx@lugnet.com>, "Mark Overmars" <markov@cs.uu.nl> wrote:
> In particular,
> I am not going to do anything that requires me to build an interpreter of
> nqc code :-(
I was considering writing an RCX bytecode simulator. If I get some free
time I'll throw something together. Considering the last simulator I
wrote was for an ARM 7111 with about a dozen on-chip peripherals, modeling
the RCX bytecode interepreter should be a piece of cake.
If I do this, I'll probably just write a portable "engine"
(mac/win/linux), and leave it to others to wrap a nice GUI around it (hint
hint).
Dave
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | What should be in the next version of RcxCC
|
| Dear RcxCC users, I am running out of ideas of what to add to Rcx Command Center. So I like to ask you what you like to see next. Please be as specific as you can. In particular, I have heard a number of people making remarks about tools for (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
