Subject:
|
Re: What should be in the next version of RcxCC
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 13:11:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1866 times
|
| |
|
|
1: a default template file, so that standard includes and defines, a main
task and other things that tend to be used in all programs can be added
automatically from the New command. I realise I could just create one and
then Open and Save As, but we forget...
2: In the Direct Control area, how about a way to turn a motor on for x
ticks - using a field next to the buttons?
3: IntelliSense. OK, now I'm being silly...
Cheers,
--
Mark R
www.markrendle.co.uk
Mark Overmars <markov@cs.uu.nl> wrote in message
news:FK9A2y.9Fx@lugnet.com...
> Dear RcxCC users,
>
> I am running out of ideas of what to add to Rcx Command Center. So I like • to
> ask you what you like to see next. Please be as specific as you can. In
> particular, I have heard a number of people making remarks about tools for
> combining nqc programs with windows programs. I thought a lot about that, • in
> particular about creating some kind of scripting language. But I am not • sure
> what people would like. Also I thought about some software simulation to
> test your programs but this is way too much work for me to create. So • please
> give me your ideas. (But don't count on me implementing them. In • particular,
> I am not going to do anything that requires me to build an interpreter of
> nqc code :-(
>
> Mark Overmars
>
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | What should be in the next version of RcxCC
|
| Dear RcxCC users, I am running out of ideas of what to add to Rcx Command Center. So I like to ask you what you like to see next. Please be as specific as you can. In particular, I have heard a number of people making remarks about tools for (...) (25 years ago, 27-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
