 | | Swan firmware crash!
|
|
Hi. I've installed new NQC and BRICXcc to test new functions in fast firmware by Dick Swan. I wanted to see if the new 1/1000th second resolution could let me drive a servo. When I try to use the SetMotorPower128 command, compiler is ok, downloading (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jul-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: I've got what Iain Hendry's got, was Re: Swan Firmware
|
|
(...) Hi John I've fixed the problem. I tracked it down by commenting out parts of my program. Luckily I started on the function containing the problem So I found it very quickly. Solving the problem took longer though. As you can see below I've (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jul-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: I've got what Iain Hendry's got, was Re: Swan Firmware
|
|
(...) Can you please email me the NQC source so that I can generate the listing to see if possibly the compiler is generating invalid code? John Hansen (19 years ago, 16-Jul-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | I've got what Iain Hendry's got, was Re: Swan Firmware
|
|
(...) I've got the flashing five problem as well, and it's really annoying, I spent most of my Friday in vain trying to fix it. I thought/think it's a stack overflow problem, but after serious optimising of my program It's made zero difference. (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jul-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC FAQ updated
|
|
I have updated the NQC FAQ with a description of how to fix a USB Tower problem that many users have experienced when downloading a program via NQC. Many users have reported that they get a "Compile Failed no (or invalid) reply from RCX" error when (...) (19 years ago, 29-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking SetUserDisplay?
|
|
(...) In C you would declare a as volatile. Jürgen (19 years ago, 11-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | NQC release 3.1r2
|
|
I have released NQC version 3.1r2. The only change from 3.1r1 is a fix to the Spybot FindWorld API function. (URL) Hansen (19 years ago, 10-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | BricxCC release news
|
|
I continue to work on getting BricxCC ready for a new official release. My sincere apologies for not having one out at the beginning of the year as I had originally planned. Life keeps getting in the way. In any case, I have a new update to BricxCC (...) (19 years ago, 6-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking SetUserDisplay?
|
|
(...) Neither of these work, although the second one does introduce a temporary for everything except for the 0 part. It will result in the display sometimes showing a value of zero. NQC tries really hard to use as few variables as it can so you (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Blocking SetUserDisplay?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the ideas! Actually these yielded some interesting results: a = 0 + ((x * 100) + y); occasionally yielded 0 (as expected), but never yielded anything other than 0 and the correct value (that I saw). a = ((x * 100) + y); and a = (x * (...) (19 years ago, 5-Jun-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
