Subject:
|
Re: NQC release
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:56:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5519 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, John Hansen wrote:
> That's the way I thought the code looked this
> morning when I checked it but it is definitely not the way it is in the source
> code I put up on the website. I will correct that.
It turns out one of the steps in the process I used to generate the .tgz source
code archive not only got the wrong version from CVS but it changed all my
unix-style line endings back to windows-style line endings. I've replaced the
latest source code archive on the NQC website with a new version (same name)
which corrects these two problems. I've tried to double check everything this
time so hopefully it is correct.
John Hansen
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: NQC release
|
| Hi John, (...) YES, this version compiles fine under my Linux system with gcc 3.3.3. You do a real great job, thank you for all your work! Regards, Michael (20 years ago, 17-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NQC release
|
| (...) I'm apparently very confused. I could have sworn I checked the code here and there wasn't a "private:" before the class Chunk definition starting at line 81. But after double checking just now indeed there is one there. That's what had me (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
