Subject:
|
Re: NQC release
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:13:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5298 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, Rich Thompson wrote:
> Ahh...I shouldn't add comments to anything before my first green tea of
> the morning. I moved line 56 back to public: and went to line 81 and
> found private: was already there...
I'm apparently very confused. I could have sworn I checked the code here and
there wasn't a "private:" before the class Chunk definition starting at line 81.
But after double checking just now indeed there is one there. That's what had
me confused. The declaration at the top is public so I was puzzled as to why
your compiler would want the definition to be something other than public.
Try this. Move the "private:" line (81) to just prior to the definition of the
struct Variable line (108). That's the way I thought the code looked this
morning when I checked it but it is definitely not the way it is in the source
code I put up on the website. I will correct that.
John Hansen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NQC release
|
| (...) It turns out one of the steps in the process I used to generate the .tgz source code archive not only got the wrong version from CVS but it changed all my unix-style line endings back to windows-style line endings. I've replaced the latest (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: NQC release
|
| Ahh...I shouldn't add comments to anything before my first green tea of the morning. I moved line 56 back to public: and went to line 81 and found private: was already there... 81 private: 82 class Chunk 83 { 84 public: 85 86 const UByte* GetData() (...) (20 years ago, 16-Mar-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
