 | | Re: IR-based proximity measurement
|
|
Brian, thanks for your advice. it has told me what is happening physically. i build a one shot measurement program to answer your questions. here is the measurement result: Distance to wall: 26 cm (at night) 7740 7696 7666 7641 7639 7613 7613 7593 (...) (18 years ago, 11-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: IR-based proximity measurement
|
|
(...) Well, there were a couple of typos, but only one I found that was critical. If you are using a "max-picking LIDAR" method, you do *not* want to divide by the number of samples. The variable "eyeon" in your code should end up with the brightest (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: IR-based proximity measurement
|
|
(...) i have downloaded the SerialPing.nqc program hoping to get an easy to use proximity sensor. i have modified it to work with only one light sensor. but it shows always -90 on the display. ok, sometimes -89 too. can anybody tell me, what i did (...) (18 years ago, 9-Jun-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX remote jammer
|
|
(...) I haven't actually used the program in a long time, and I'm getting compiler errors now - I think I've updated BricxCC/NQC since then, and I might have to adjust a few things. At any rate, it shouldn't be far from working, so play around with (...) (19 years ago, 17-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | RCX remote jammer
|
|
this is going to be short, b/c I only have a minute. Check out (URL) (after mod) for an NQC program that will allow you to jam almost any IR remote control signal. Direct prgm link: (URL) Instructions: (URL) Enjoy, and please give me feedback (...) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) I've never docked the current toolbars to the side. I wouldn't miss it. (...) I do normally rearrange them (normally to a single row). I'd be annoyed for a few minutes then forget all about it if it was removed :) (...) Personally, I hate the (...) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) There are no functional differences between the planned toolbars and menus aside from the toolbar docking support. The difference is really just in appearance. I have spent the last several months in my real job working on a project to spruce (...) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) John, As other's have elluded to, I am not worried about changes to the IDE environment... I am hooked on this tool, so whatever you come up with, I will work with it.. Dave (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) Me too- what he said, all of it. Mindstorms wouldn't be 1/16 as cool without BricxCC. But I just use it, I don't move stuff around. Tim (Smith) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BricxCC Feedback Requested
|
|
(...) Nope. I leave stuff where it is. (...) Nope. I leave stuff where it is. (...) The whole BricxCC environment is the single most important feature making Mindstorms inherently usable for me. Thanks John, for all the work you've put into its (...) (19 years ago, 16-Apr-06, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, FTX)
|
